|
Online
Jan 10, 2007 14:08:18 GMT -5
Post by James on Jan 10, 2007 14:08:18 GMT -5
OK so in 2011 it will be our 25th anniversary. I say we break 20th century tradition and do something 21st century. We could all get web cams (hell they're cheap enough) and use Team Speak to talk !!
Very little expense for everyone and easy to do. All from the comfort of your home with no traveling expenses. I could set it all up in a weeks time
|
|
|
Online
Jan 10, 2007 14:12:33 GMT -5
Post by Clark on Jan 10, 2007 14:12:33 GMT -5
now I've heard it all, I use a Sony PS2 "eyetoy" as my webcam, the picture is great, it has a built in microphone, they cost about $12 used, and you can find them at any used video game store, what kind of software would we need to do this?
|
|
|
Online
Jan 10, 2007 14:15:10 GMT -5
Post by James on Jan 10, 2007 14:15:10 GMT -5
you'd need the web cam software that comes with the web cam and download the free software from team speak. oh and a microphone to talk
|
|
Rochelle
Junior
Rochelle McFarland
GO GATORS!!!!!!!!
Posts: 124
|
Online
Jan 10, 2007 14:19:05 GMT -5
Post by Rochelle on Jan 10, 2007 14:19:05 GMT -5
OK! Are you guys kidding!!! Someone would definately have to come to my HOUSE to help me with this one!! LOL!!! I just figured out the whole editing my profile thing!
|
|
|
Online
Jan 10, 2007 14:24:13 GMT -5
Post by James on Jan 10, 2007 14:24:13 GMT -5
I can walk you through the whole thing Don't worry.
BTW, Clark. Does Windows messenger have a web cam feature?
|
|
|
Online
Jan 10, 2007 14:31:23 GMT -5
Post by Clark on Jan 10, 2007 14:31:23 GMT -5
yes it does, but it can't conference more than two cams in a chat
|
|
|
Online
Jan 10, 2007 14:32:39 GMT -5
Post by James on Jan 10, 2007 14:32:39 GMT -5
OK not a problem, I'll work out something else. Hell I got 4 1/2 years
|
|
|
Online
Jan 10, 2007 15:13:49 GMT -5
Post by Kelly Hampton on Jan 10, 2007 15:13:49 GMT -5
Who knows what the technology will be then?
|
|
|
Online
Jan 10, 2007 17:03:19 GMT -5
Post by tammi86 on Jan 10, 2007 17:03:19 GMT -5
Rochelle, do not feel alone...I am so technologically challenged it's not even funny! I can barely operate the DVD player at home...and at work I can do computer stuff to the extent that my job requires it, but that's all!
|
|
|
Online
Jan 10, 2007 17:23:37 GMT -5
Post by Bob Lombardi on Jan 10, 2007 17:23:37 GMT -5
Hey all. Here's the deal on webcams. I kinda know because we study this crap in school. The problem is bandwidth and system resources. For someone to operate a webcam, they are gobbling up mucho bandwidth on their internet connection. As an example of what bandwidth is, I'll say that it can be compared to a regular water hose. No mater how much water pressure you have, you can only get so much water through the hose over a given period of time. This amount usually coincides with your internet speed. If you have a typical dsl line, your speed can range (in theory) from 768 kilobytes per second to about 3000 kilobytes per second. When you have a webcam, you are trying to cram a series of pictures through that water hose. Each picture, along with the audio, can be upwards of about 300 kilobytes, sometimes more. That doesn't leave you too much more room. It also slows down the servers (consider the servers as a place that exchanges the data from your puter with other puters) Even so, your computer has to have mucho memory (RAM) and processor speed to be able to accommodate such streams of data. There are teleconferencing programs that enable multiple cameras, but I think you have to keep switching between who you want to see; that is, you can't view all conference members at the same time. I think that there are vendors who are trying to come up with something. In college, we tried fooling around with a free version of Skype. I don't recall if it did it or not. You can Google Skype (probably http://www.skype.com) and d-load the free version and see if it works. In conclusion, I don't think they've figured out a way to stuff all that data into the limited bandwidth of an internet connection yet. I will actually be going back to school on the 25th and that is part of the curriculum.
|
|
|
Online
Jan 10, 2007 19:04:12 GMT -5
Post by margarita on Jan 10, 2007 19:04:12 GMT -5
You are really kidding, right?! I have no idea how to work a webcam.
|
|
|
Online
Jan 10, 2007 19:21:40 GMT -5
Post by Bob Lombardi on Jan 10, 2007 19:21:40 GMT -5
Hi Margarita! No, I'm not kidding. I'm really going to school on the 25th. LOL. ;D But seriously, a webcam is no big deal. If you bought a newer webcam and plug it into a computer running windows xp, it pretty much installs and runs itself. If you use an eyetoy, a little tinkering is required. The explanation I gave was to describe why it is not likely to obtain multiple simultaneous webcam conversations.
Ciao, Bob
|
|
|
Online
Jan 10, 2007 19:37:27 GMT -5
Post by James on Jan 10, 2007 19:37:27 GMT -5
Good points Bob! I didn't know you couldn't get multiple cams on one screen. Let's see what Vista does in a few years. I know I can get everyone in a virtual room and have an audio chat via Team Speak www.goteamspeak.com hopefully there will be a step up in multi video
|
|
|
Online
Jan 10, 2007 19:43:37 GMT -5
Post by Bob Lombardi on Jan 10, 2007 19:43:37 GMT -5
Hello again, I did a little research and it seems that Earthlink has a free video conferencing beta. It supports both Windows and Mac platforms. You can check it out for yourself at www.research.earthlink.net/confmgr/ . I don't have enough time to check it out right now, Beauty and the Geek is on in 17 minutes ;D
|
|
|
Online
Jan 10, 2007 19:47:30 GMT -5
Post by James on Jan 10, 2007 19:47:30 GMT -5
Oh good lord, not that show! ;D OK looks like a possibility. We'll have to get some guinea pigs
|
|